
I am so sick of this shit I've been reading about all these lawsuits against torrent sites like ^----
(here's what I was reading: http://torrentfreak.com/the-pirate-bay-taken-offline-by-swedish-authorities-090824/ this is the shirt the kids who made it sent the companies that tried to stop them!!)
Here's the way I see it, and I don't think I'm wrong:
You're telling me that downloading songs or whatever off of the internet is illegal because someone did not pay for that digital content. You're mad because companies like Disney are only making millions instead of billions. I get that.
But I don't think you've really thought this lawsuit through, guys. From what I've been reading, your argument in court is that by downloading a song illegally from the internet, you have access to content that you didn't pay for - which means you aren't likely to buy the song legally since you already have it. (Wow, no brainer there.) So it's an issue of the prevention of purchase.
But why stop at torrents? By that logic, all my VCR tapes from the 90's are illegal. Stuff I taped off of TV? Mixed tapes I made friends? burned CDs that old boyfriends gave me? By your logic, if my best friend gives me a mix for my birthday, I have to pay for each song, even if she paid for them? If a movie gets a bad review, and that's the reason I don't go see it, is the reviewer responsible? Financially? I think not.
Granted, most of these examples are sort of out of date, but how is more modern DVR recording any different? If I tivo The Office this season, and I have it on my tivo box saved, I'm not gonna buy the DVDs any time soon, am I? No. But that's legal.
Unless I LOVE something, I'm NOT GOING TO BUY IT ANYWAY because I can watch most stuff on HBO or hulu or netflix, LEGALLY. So why is my Tivo box different from torrents? Why? Because you can ADVERTISE on Tivo. That's what it comes down to. Companies don't want to take down Tivo because it's also a revenue source for them through ads.
I say end this madness. If you keep filing these stupid lawsuits, like the RIAA kept doing, not only do you look like an asshole for fining some poor college kid $70,000 for downloading one album (I get it, you were trying to make an example out of him, but you just looked like bastards) but you also open up bad avenues if you win.
If you win, and torrents get stopped, two things will happen:
1. Someone with a law degree will notice that there's no difference between internet downloads and DVR, and it will snowball from there. Soon you'll have to give this up, or everything will be illegal that isn't a direct purchase from a retailer. THEN every company will suffer because no one that doesn't own a company has any money right now. WE ARE POOR, DISNEY. POOR. I'm sorry your stock dropped or whatever it is you're bitching about, but I just can't afford to buy a copy of your Miley Montana movie or whatshername. But I know that about a bahzillion kids did. It's not like you didn't make any money. Maybe if actors didn't get paid millions of dollars you could save some dough.
2. Smart people will just find another way to get shit for free.
Either way, you're wasting billions of dollars and huge amounts of time on a LOSING battle. People will always find a way to get around whatever rules you put in place, so why not ADAPT to the times, like Hulu did? Why not make more of your content available for free in a setting where you can also advertise new content? Why not use the power of the internet instead of fighting it? Your business models need to change. Because you can't turn off the internet altogether, and people will always share content. And the more you keep this up, the more you seem like stiff old Douchebags while you make stuff like hulu seem modern and cool.
I mean, you want to dig the hole for yourself? Go ahead. I left a shovel outside for you.
-Flap





